Proposed Action

Since 1891, Puget Sound Naval Shipyard and Intermediate Maintenance Facility (PSNS & IMF) has built and supported vital naval assets through two world wars and several conflicts, many technological changes, as well as fluctuations in our nation’s economy. Through adaptability, perseverance and devotion to duty, the facility has maintained its reputation as a provider of world-class service to all U.S. Navy vessels.

a submarine docked at a pier

Background

PSNS & IMF is the Navy’s primary provider for the maintenance, repair, modernization, inactivation, and recycling of ships, submarines, and aircraft carriers in the Pacific Fleet. PSNS & IMF is the only Navy shipyard on the West Coast with a dry dock that can accommodate nuclear-powered aircraft carriers for repair and maintenance. Additionally, PSNS & IMF is the only Navy shipyard that is approved to recycle nuclear-powered submarines.

Much of the infrastructure at PSNS & IMF dates back to the late 1800s and early 1900s and it was primarily designed for building and maintaining ship classes that are no longer part of the modern naval fleet. Other than construction of Dry Dock 6 in the early 1960s, the shipyard has had few major infrastructure updates since the mid-1900s, which has led to significant production inefficiencies for maintaining current ships. The shipyard lacks the necessary capacity to accommodate new and future classes of ships.

Proposed Action

Pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969, the Navy is preparing an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) to evaluate the potential environmental impacts of constructing a new dry dock and associated waterfront infrastructure improvements at PSNS & IMF. PSNS & IMF is located on Naval Base Kitsap – Bremerton in Washington state.

Specifically, the Navy’s Proposed Action is to:

  • Construct a new multi-mission dry dock at PSNS & IMF. The proposed dry dock would be designed and built to serve multiple missions and therefore would be classified as a multi-mission dry dock.
  • Upgrade Dry Dock 6 to meet current seismic standards. Dry Dock 6 is important because it is the only dry dock on the West Coast that can accommodate a nuclear-powered aircraft carrier.
  • Modify, demolish, and/or replace other piers, wharves, quay walls, buildings, cranes, and utilities to make space for the new multi-mission dry dock.
  • The Proposed Action also includes dredging to create turning basins, entrance channels, and adequate water depth at wharves and piers.

PSNS & IMF is located at Naval Base Kitsap – Bremerton, which is located on the north side of Sinclair Inlet within the city of Bremerton in Kitsap County, Washington.

Purpose and Need for the Proposed Action

The purpose of the Proposed Action is to address critical deficiencies in dry dock capability, capacity, and seismic survivability at Naval Base Kitsap – Bremerton to enable PSNS & IMF to meet its mission to support the Navy’s fleet.

The Proposed Action is needed because:

  • PSNS & IMF does not have the dry dock capability to support the Navy’s newest class of nuclear-powered aircraft carrier (CVN), USS Gerald R. Ford (CVN 78).
  • PSNS & IMF does not have the dry dock and pier capacity to conduct the required future overhauling, refueling, inactivating, and recycling of nuclear-powered submarines. PSNS & IMF must also maintain the capacity to perform emergent work such as battle damage repair.
  • Dry Dock 6, the only dry dock on the West Coast that can accommodate a nuclear-powered aircraft carrier, does not meet current seismic standards.

A new dry dock and associated waterfront infrastructure improvements are necessary to provide the capacity and capability to meet the fleet’s future operational needs.

Preliminary Alternatives

The Navy conducted several preliminary studies to determine alternative ways to meet its purpose and need for improving the shipyard. Several alternatives that meet the purpose and need were evaluated against screening criteria. At this time, two preliminary action alternatives are being considered for further evaluation in the EIS, in addition to the No Action Alternative. The public is invited to help identify other alternatives that meet the purpose and need. The alternatives currently being considered vary in the location of the proposed multi-mission dry dock, as well as its size and supporting components.

Summary of Preliminary Alternatives
Feature Alternative 1
No Action Alternative
Preliminary Alternative 2
Multi-Mission Dry Dock at Dry Dock 3
Preliminary Alternative 3
Multi-Mission Dry Dock at Mooring A
Multi-Mission Dry Dock Location No multi-mission dry dock constructed Dry Dock 3 Mooring A
Multi-Mission Dry Dock Size No multi-mission dry dock constructed 190 feet x 1,250 feet 190 feet x 1,250 feet
Multi-Mission Dry Dock Wharf No multi-mission dry dock constructed No multi-mission dry dock wharf constructed New nuclear-powered aircraft carrier repair wharf at multi-mission dry dock east wall
Forge Shop No change New forge shop at Naval Base Kitsap – Bangor No change
Dry Dock 6 No change Seismic upgrade Seismic upgrade
Pier 2 No new Pier 2 constructed New Pier 2 No new Pier 2 constructed
Pier 4 No change Demolish and replace with new pier Demolish and replace with new pier
Pier 5 No change Demolish No change
Pier 6 No change Demolish and replace with new pier for nuclear-powered aircraft carrier repairs No change
Hammerhead Crane No change Demolish Demolish
Pier 7 No change Demolish No change
Mooring A No change No change Demolish
Dredging No dredging Entrance channels and demolition of pier pilings/ footers Entrance channels, new turning basin, and demolition of pier pilings/footers

Alternative 1: No Action Alternative

Under the No Action Alternative, the proposed multi-mission dry dock would not be constructed; Dry Dock 6 would not be upgraded to meet current seismic standards; and other component actions would not occur. The Navy would continue to maintain, repair, and operate existing facilities, but would continue to experience production inefficiencies due to the shipyard’s limited capacity and capabilities for servicing current and future ships.

The No Action Alternative does not meet the purpose and need for the Proposed Action, but as required by the National Environmental Policy Act, the No Action Alternative will be analyzed to provide a baseline for measuring the environmental impacts of the action alternatives.

Preliminary Alternative 2: Multi-Mission Dry Dock at Dry Dock 3

Under Preliminary Alternative 2, the Navy would:

  • Demolish Dry Dock 3
  • Construct a multi-mission dry dock at the location of Dry Dock 3
  • Construct a forge shop at Naval Base Kitsap – Bangor
  • Upgrade Dry Dock 6 to meet current seismic standards
  • Construct Pier 2
  • Demolish Piers 4,5,6 and 7 including the Hammerhead Crane on Pier 6 and Dry Dock 3
  • Replace Piers 4 and 6 with new piers
  • Dredge sediment and demolish pier pilings/footers to create entrance channels and adequate water depth at wharves and piers

Figure 1: Preliminary Alternative 2

a map showing multi-mission dry dock at Dry Dock 3

Preliminary Alternative 3: Multi-Mission Dry Dock at Mooring A

Under Preliminary Alternative 3, the Navy would:

  • Demolish Mooring A
  • Construct a multi-mission dry dock at the location of Mooring A
  • Construct a wharf (Wharf 2) on the outer east wall of the multi-mission dry dock
  • Upgrade Dry Dock 6 and Pier 6 to meet current seismic standards
  • Demolish Pier 4, the Hammerhead Crane on Pier 6, and Mooring A
  • Replace Pier 4 with a new pier
  • Dredge sediment and demolish pier pilings/footers to create entrance channels, a new turning basin, and adequate water depth at wharves and piers

Figure 2: Preliminary Alternative 3

a map showing large multi-mission dry dock at dry dock 3

Resources to be Analyzed in the EIS

In the EIS, the Navy will analyze the potential impacts the Proposed Action and alternatives may have on the environmental resource areas listed below. During the public scoping period, the public can suggest additional resources and alternatives for consideration.

  • Air Quality
  • Water Quality
  • Geological Resources
  • Marine Biological Resources
  • Cultural Resources
  • American Indian Traditional Resources
  • Land Use and Recreation
  • Visual Resources
  • Noise
  • Infrastructure and Utilities
  • Transportation and Traffic
  • Marine Navigation
  • Public Health and Safety
  • Hazardous Materials and Wastes
  • Socioeconomics
  • Environmental Justice

Share: